I was wondering if you had considered looking at a 4 in 6 tunnel support. I
know that it may seem backwards with a lot of things moving to native v6
but the 44 net is a great resource for hams. One example of why I can see
needing this is a lot of providers, specifically wireless, are doing a
double or triple NAT of their own ipv4 address space. While this is OK for
most internet activities it is not good to support inbound connections. You
do however get a native IPV6 address that is not nated and fully routable.
Having a headend location to support a 4 in 6 tunnel would help a lot of
folks. I do support large networks as part of my day job and would be
willing to help set up and support if you wanted to take this on.
Thanks,
Scott