Re: [44net] AMPRNet Interoperability with BGP

Incidentally, we are also creating VPN tunnels to bring 'islands' into routers that have BGP capability and advertising from those routers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMI9YSM0mzY On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:21 AM, K7VE - John <k7ve(a)k7ve.org> wrote: > In 44.24.0.0/16 we have multiple BGP gateways coming on line. > > We have moved address space to accommodate larger masks and people have > been willing to move as we explain the rationale and provide a window of > time to accomplish the movement. > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Bryan Fields <bryan(a)bryanfields.net> > wrote: > >> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) >> _______________________________________________ >> I'm on a plane, sorry for the top post. >> >> Brian, how much traffic does the current AMPRnet gw handle peak? >> >> Would it be possible to aggregate some of these routes selectivily or >> have some people volunteer to move ip? In the greater scheme of things 350 >> prefixes is not huge. >> >> My concern would be on the routing db and filter side. But this could be >> automated via rpsl. >> >> >> >> On June 16, 2015 12:00:09 PM EDT, Brian Kantor <Brian(a)ucsd.edu> wrote: >> >(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) >> >_______________________________________________ >> >On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:09:45AM -0700, Cory (NQ1E) wrote: >> >> Do we have a rough idea on how many /24s that would amount to? >> > >> >After summarizing the smaller routes at the /24 level, the number of >> >subnet routes that would have to be advertised is about 350. If we >> >summarize at the /16 level, there would have to be about 12. >> > >> >We *know* that most of the approx 475 gateways in the database are no >> >longer active. These are still contributing to this total. >> > >> >Despite multiple requests by Chris, so far no one with PHP programming >> >experience has stepped forward to help write the program that is >> >necessary >> >to clear them out. I would wager that the number of subnet routes >> >necessary would drop precipitously if we were to eliminate the inactive >> >gateways. >> > - Brian >> >_________________________________________ >> >44Net mailing list >> >44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu >> >http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net >> >> -- >> Bryan Fields >> 727-409-1194 >> http://bryanfields.net >>