11 Aug
2021
11 Aug
'21
9:05 p.m.
Whatever it takes, we (IRLP) will coordinate activities with you. It does not sound any
big changes changes are happening soon. Maybe never.
-k9dc
On Aug 11, 2021, at 20:12, Tony Langdon via 44Net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
On 12/8/21 1:29 am, Dave Gingrich via 44Net wrote:
Tony,
IRLP will be no problem, all we need to know is when a new IP is available and working.
There is no reason you couldn’t run with both the old and new IP simultaneously for a
short time. Folks will connect to whatever the database says is the IP. Worst case it
should take only a few hours for the new IP to circulate through the IRLP network.
That may work in the case of a simple, standard IRLP reflector running
sfreflect, it's a lot more complex with mine, because of the specific IP
bindings, hence the need of coordination. Every tbd or tlb instance I
run has a SFBind2IP set to the reflector's IP. I started doing that
when I had address selection issues, which caused the wrong IP to be
used from reflector to client. And I may have had port conflicts
without specific bindings as well in the past. I haven't audited the
system for those conflicts lately, as there has been no need.
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com