13 Jun
2015
13 Jun
'15
5:20 p.m.
Since the 2 tunnels are actually similar in speed and latency with the IPIP
link, there is no route selection.
If the VPNs are up, traffic will go that way. If the interface fails, IPIP
is used as a fallback solution.
That's all, no EIGRP involved. Just a small step...
-----Original Message-----
From: 44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
[mailto:44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Don
Fanning
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 00:13
To: AMPRNet working group
Subject: Re: [44net] Strange Broadcasts...
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
How does DL and LX figure out which is the better route for your traffic?
BGP just says your there and to send me traffic.
EIGRP could talk between DL and LX and say, "I'm a faster route for YO2LOJ,
make me the preference for traffic coming in."
It would also allow you to load balance your traffic between DL and LX
rather than having a fail over route and the time incurred by everyone
sending BGP announcements during the shuffle of routes.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Marius Petrescu <marius(a)yo2loj.ro> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
I have such a setup using a direct L2TP to DL and a PPtP to LX, running
BGP
over it (with private AS numbers).
If this primary link fails, traffic switches to IPIP automatically.
This was set up as a proof of concept and remained that way.
...