Hi,
I recently talked with Brian briefly about this and wanted to throw it out to the group.
It’s incredibly rare to see any of the tunnels that have been created, represented in a
Google search. While I understand and agree that any site that will become a high volume
site has no place on Amprnet (we have to share resources) it also seems pointless to
create a website that is undiscoverable. After all, isn’t the primary purpose of a
website to share it’s content with others. I recently created a website on a 44net gateway
and after several weeks, (and even convincing Brian to add a meta TXT entry allowing me to
ask google to crawl), I am not seeing any content on Google. I put in a service request
to google (not the easiest task) and I was advised that robots.txt or some other
prevention device is blocking indexing all the subdirectories on
amp.org. I was told that
the few gateways that I see in the results were likely crawled before the restriction on
ampr.org <http://ampr.org/> was applied. I created the website for our ARES group
and placed it on an ampr gateway because we don’t have funds, and in reality, see very
little traffic. We had a .net site last year and averaged about 50 visitors a month. My
question is - is it really necessary to prevent the whole of
ampr.org
<http://ampr.org/> from being crawled (except of course the top domain which does
show up). So many ip addresses, but almost none visible seems a real pity.
Thanks for listening. My only hope is that this creates a little bit of debate around the
issue.
73
Roger
VA7LBB