6 Apr
2021
6 Apr
'21
2:54 p.m.
I think the purpose of such "for documentation" subnets is that you can give
some
really valid examples of configuration, where e.g. the user has got a /29 subnet and
you want to explain what is the network address, the address of the gateway (router),
the subnet broadcast address, and the usable addresses in the network.
Sure you can use things like 44.xx.xx.xx 44.xx.xx.xx+1 etc but usually you will have
lost the non-technical reader and it is much better to give examples with real addresses
that only have to be adapted to the assigned subnet.
44.128.0.0/16 has been a test subnet for a long time, and there even is romoured use
of that range outside AMPRnet as a "test network" or "local range"
(similar to RFC1918)
due to misunderstanding. I think it would be the last network to ever use when we
would ever run out of address space. No need to worry about people having it in their
configuration by then, they would have noticed their mistake long before.
(44.128.0.0/16 has been in our bogon list of non-routed addresses ever since we
established
our gateway here in the Netherlands, together with RFC1918, RFC6598, IANA reserved nets)
Rob
On 4/6/21 12:04 AM, Cory (NQ1E) via 44Net wrote:
Ideally you wouldn't use properly formatted IP
addresses at all when
checking in your code unless they were meant to be used. You could instead
use something like: 44.xx.xx.xx
A perfectly reasonable exception to that is if you need your code to pass
automated tests that require a properly formatted value to exist there. In
that case, using 44net's testing subnet seems not only appropriate, but
ideal. ;)
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net