On 13-01-23 07:03 PM, lleachii(a)aol.com wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hessu,
I'm using RIP44 v1.1 for route population. Line 201 is modified to add
routes to table '44.' My setup is rather straightforward. You will
find my configuration files at:
http://kb3vwg-013.ampr.org
IP rules specify:
- FROM 44.60.44.0/24 TO my 192.168.LAN.0/24 use main table, priority 1
(not required for operation)
- TO 44.0.0.0/8 use table 44, priority 44
- FROM 44.0.0.0/8 use table 44, priority 45
My main table (that tunl0 uses) has the following 3 routes:
- default via 192.168.LAN.1 dev eth0 metric 100
- 44.60.44.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 44.60.44.1
- 192.168.LAN.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src
192.168.LAN.IPofRouter
Table 44 contains 2 routes at startup:
- EITHER (1) - 'default via 169.228.66.251 dev tunl0 onlink' (for
Internet access for 44hosts - the 44.0.0.1 via AMPR populates via
RIP44 when I use this route)
-OR-
- '44.0.0.1 via 169.228.66.251 dev tunl0 onlink' (I need one of these
seeded in my router RIP44 to operate, if I use the default, the
44.0.0.1 route above is added by RIP44 automatically as '44.0.0.1 via
169.228.66.251 dev tunl0 onlink window 840')
AND
(2) - 44.60.44.0/24 dev eth1
~Lynwood
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
http://www.ampr.org/donate.html
Has anyone tried rip44d on a dd-wrt router? Probably not enough room
for the ip table? Just curious as I have a couple of these routers, also
have
an e2500 running tomato....was thinking I could just dedicate a router to
amprnet to simplify my setup...
Cheers,
John (BRRR...-20c here with wind chill -30)