On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 10:56:41AM -0800, David Ranch wrote:
My speicific issue here is that my local AMPR
coordinator recently
told me that unless all my IP addresses had a DNS entry, I risked
loosing my allocations. I think this is a policy that *he* is
setting himself (not a global AMPR policy) and though I don't agree
with his view, I obliged to give him ~1024 hostnames to fill things
out. If other AMPR coordinators have similar approaches, then DNS
entries mean everything to the IP allocation be it a subnet or a /32.
This seems strange to me. It certainly isn't a policy that I made.
- Brian