10 Jun
2012
10 Jun
'12
11:23 p.m.
On Jun 10, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Brian Kantor <Brian(a)ucsd.edu> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 03:56:30PM +0200, Rob Janssen wrote:
Yes!
In my opinion, whatever a small but vocal group
is claiming, we need to support
tunnels. Not everyone is in the position to announce BGP routes, and many radio
amateurs have no intention to become network buffs.
I expect we'll support BOTH tunnels and directly routed subnets. I don't see that they're mutually exclusive in
any way, are they?
- Brian
No!
Sent from my PDP-11
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net