28 Jul
2021
28 Jul
'21
3:51 p.m.
I would agree, I'm still trying to wrap my head around what real
technical problem is renumber trying to resolve, and I can't help but
keeping coming back to the conclusion, the problem trying to be solved is
not that of an immediate technical nature, but that of a matter of
convenience. If all of the publicly routable IP's are moved into 1 block,
the other block becomes fair game for reallocation in the future. This
reallocation could be for either, network expansion of the routable space,
or offered for sale. I understand that the statements are put in place
saying we are not selling, But to be fair that was what was said a couple
of years back as well, and now we have a /10 less of space.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 1:41 PM John Ronan via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
wrote:
I disagree, I'm after reading the proposal carefully front to back for
the third time today. The more I read it the more I'm coming to the
conclusion is that it seems to be un-necessary work being thrust upon
everyone in the 44.128/10 space to renumber their networks just to have
the exact same feature set and (now thoroughly annoyed) users after all
the effort.
This doesn't actually make any sense to me now.
Surely we can be more ambitious and do better than that?
John
EI7IG
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
Finally,
those OMs who have Internet routed Subnets (outside 44.143)
would have to move, but its clearly worth the effort.
ACK