1 Sep
2017
1 Sep
'17
3:57 p.m.
A Xagyl 440MHz Mini-PCI card and an Alix3D2 board would make for a powerful
packet node!
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Steve L <kb9mwr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Brian,
You read my mind.
You all have to excuse John, K7VE. He represents North West Digital and
has a bias. They have been trying to develop a 70 cm data radio for a
while.
Same goes if you are on other lists and he brings up the DVSI/AMBE patents,
as NWDigital sells a hardware AMBE device.
The Oct 2013 ARRL proposal to modernize the rules for data transmissions
appears stalled. So yes, if there is an image use, its classified as an
image
transmission, Not Data. The first person to use this angle was the late
John
Stevensen, KD6OZH. It has since been used by David Bern, W2LNX (2012
DCC), myself and others to experiment with the Doodle Labs and Xagyl 70cm
802.11 devices.
Maybe we need to petition the FCC ourselves? I can't say I always fell the
ARRL represents what we are doing very well. And their proposal did squat
for VHF/UHF in my opinion.
Steve, KB9MWR
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Brian Kantor
<Brian(a)ucsd.edu> wrote:
Why do all new-technology discussions about the ham bands degenerate
into arguments about USA rules? No wonder most innovation takes
place in other countries.
- Brian
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:26 AM, K7VE - John <k7ve(a)k7ve.org> wrote:
> Just remember, in the US, that 70cm data must fit in 100 kHz and be 56
> kbauds (Same on the 219 Mhz band), but this is interesting work.
97.305(c)
> and 97.307(f)6
>
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net