15 Aug
2021
15 Aug
'21
3:52 a.m.
I guess I am missing exactly why it is so important to keep dns in one
piece (centralized to one server) as you suggest. What is so bad about
dns acting as a tree that is crawled to resolve an address? if it's
connectivity that's the issue then the same issue exists generally
getting from your network to mine and mine to yours. If latency is the
issue, that's what caching is for. What issue do you wish to address by
keeping all ampr dns on a small set of servers.
Eric
AF6EP
On 2021-08-14 12:50, Rob PE1CHL via 44Net wrote:
Note that "being able to manage ones own
subnet" does not imply that
DNS will have to be delegated.
It could just as well be a possibility to edit DNS records on the
central DNS with some authorization method
that allows you only to edit records within your own range and with
your registered callsign.
It still keeps the DNS in once piece.
Rob
On 8/14/21 9:42 PM, Af6ep via 44Net wrote:
Agreed, Zone transfers SHOULD be supported at
least to Amprnet address
space...... and deligations to run one's own forward and reverse dns
SHOULD be allowed/maybe even encouraged. If I have a /24 or larger
which is bgp announced (which I do), I ought be able to fully manage
the Forward and Reverse DNS for it and subdomain.mycallsigns.ampr.org
without having to go my coordinator. effectively by request I ought
be able to be deligated those duties by my coordinator so they don't
have to.
Eric
AF6EP
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net