15 Jun
2015
15 Jun
'15
3:34 p.m.
Subject:
Re: [44net] Strange Broadcasts...
From:
Bryan Fields <Bryan(a)bryanfields.net>
Date:
06/14/2015 09:48 PM
To:
AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
On 6/14/15 3:35 PM, Rob Janssen wrote:
I am not talking about the work you do locally but about the way you approach
"us" after you have found some
problem with your gateway implementation.
Not even mainly about the discussion that just has started, but about a similar discussion
that was started
about the same topic some time ago. You continuously refer to Brian's system at UCSD
as "broken", and
I don't like that attitude.
Especially not because it really is possible to fit in your system to co-exist in the
network as it is now, as is
demonstrated by our gateway.
Rob
>Your problem is that you want to try to talk
us into believing that we have a problem with
>reliability, while for most of us it is clear that we first and foremost have a
problem with
>existance. The amateur digital network is nearly dead, we are trying to revive it
and make
>it thrive like it did in the early days, a network built and operated by hobbyists,
and you
>are continuously trying to impress us with your knowledge about professional networks
and
>your concerns about failure modes.
Rob, take a chill pill.
Take a look at the HamWAN, HAMNET, and what I'm doing here in the bay area.
It's very much alive, and we're educating people about high-speed ham packet
networks everyday. I had over 200 people at the TAPR forum at Dayton this
year for my talk.