Hi Rihard,
Now is not 1993.
The times of the legendary ka9q.exe long gone and there are many good
solutions. That works through the NAT, allows clients to use a dynamic
address and have reliable authorization.
Why still KA9Q/NOS? This is good old British tradition?
that was the 'stone age' :)
You may refer to the docs on Maiko site:
http://www.langelaar.net/projects/jnos2/documents/
73, gus i0ojj