Dave Gingrich via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> writes:
Is an ARIN ASN
number mandatory in such a situation ? If not
mandatory, would it be a good practice to have one ?
It is mandatory. But like IPv4 addresses, they are a limited resource,
and you need to have connections to multiple backbone providers to
even apply for one. IOW, you need to be in the business. Nearly all of
us here will use the Public ASN of our provider.
Sorry Dave, that's just wrong.
1. We have had 32-bit ASNs for a long while now and while they are
limited because 2^32 is a finite number, they are not scarce because
it is a big number. Just as IPv6 numbers (2^128) are finite but not
scarce. Old 16-bit ASNs are scarce but today the need for those is
similar to the need for a personalised license plate.
2. You need to have a distinct routing policy. That is the condition.
One way of doing that is by having multiple backbone providers. That
is not the only way. You do need connections to at least two networks
but there is no prescription about how this must be done or that the
relationship must be IP transit. I know this because I have obtained
ASNs for small networks doing unusual things from RIPE. You do have
to make a coherent case.
3. There is no requirement that it must be an ASN from ARIN. Not from
ARIN or RIPE, not from the networking community, and not from AMPRNet
unless a new policy that is gratuitously at odds with both industry
and amateur radio practice has been invented. There are several ASNs
that I know of in Europe announcing 44 space using ASNs from RIPE. It
would be unusual (but it does happen) for a network operator in
Europe to use an ASN from ARIN.
More generally, learning about and experimenting with networking is
something that we ought to encouraged. Generally, the spirit of autonomy
in Amateur Radio (in the sense of not relying strongly on a single piece
of infrastructure belonging to someone else) is well served by operating
networks. Just because "nearly all of us don't" doesn't mean that those
who want to shouldn't.
There is a perception that running a BGP-speaking network is somehow
complicated or dangerous or magic of some sort. That's complete
nonsense. Yes there is a learning curve, as with everything. Nothing
more than that.
I don't have a view about whether Toussaint wants to do this or whether
their plan will make sense. But let's try not to discourage people from
learning and exploring, shall we? That's not what amateur radio is
about.
73s VE3HW
(Current operator of AS205586, ex of AS{549, 6401, 13901, 60241, ...})