On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Brian <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org> wrote:
policy route 44/8 via their tunnel interface
I think we're getting a bit ahead of ourselves here proposing new
special announcements.
Here's another idea: don't assume anything spans the whole 44/8.
Instead of policy-routing 44/8, policy route for each of the routes
found in the encap. 44.24.221.0/24 isn't in the encap, so you should
source packets to it from your commercial ISP source IP. UCSD is not
involved.
Tom KD7LXL