Hessu,
I'm using RIP44 v1.1 for route population. Line 201 is modified to add
routes to table '44.' My setup is rather straightforward. You will find
my configuration files at:
http://kb3vwg-013.ampr.org
IP rules specify:
- FROM 44.60.44.0/24 TO my 192.168.LAN.0/24 use main table, priority 1
(not required for operation)
- TO 44.0.0.0/8 use table 44, priority 44
- FROM 44.0.0.0/8 use table 44, priority 45
My main table (that tunl0 uses) has the following 3 routes:
- default via 192.168.LAN.1 dev eth0 metric 100
- 44.60.44.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 44.60.44.1
- 192.168.LAN.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src
192.168.LAN.IPofRouter
Table 44 contains 2 routes at startup:
- EITHER (1) - 'default via 169.228.66.251 dev tunl0 onlink' (for
Internet access for 44hosts - the 44.0.0.1 via AMPR populates via RIP44
when I use this route)
-OR-
- '44.0.0.1 via 169.228.66.251 dev tunl0 onlink' (I need one of these
seeded in my router RIP44 to operate, if I use the default, the 44.0.0.1
route above is added by RIP44 automatically as '44.0.0.1 via
169.228.66.251 dev tunl0 onlink window 840')
AND
(2) - 44.60.44.0/24 dev eth1
~Lynwood