On 1/13/16 1:11 PM, Tom Hayward wrote:
Alternatively, my opinion is that Chris would get more
help if the
project were open sourced. Now instead of recruiting volunteers, he
will have contributors. This allows for a lot more flexibility. For
example, a ham in one part of the world is stuck at home on a rainy
weekend is setting up an AMPR system and encounters a bug. Meanwhile,
Chris is enjoying a weekend away from the computer in a part of the
world with more favorable weather. With an open source project, the
first ham can dig around for the bug and send Chris a patch without
any pre-approval. When Chris returns, he can vet the patch before
applying it to the SVN [or whatever technology] repo. This
significantly lowers the bar for volunteers and administration.
If the portal is open sourced, expect a patch from me within the first week.
+1
The other point I'll make is I have no interest in helping out with a non-open
source project. If you want to continue with sponsoring a close source
project, don't expect many people to want to help.
73's W9CR
--
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net