29 Jul
2021
29 Jul
'21
5:03 a.m.
On 29/7/21 1:38 am, Antonios Chariton (daknob) via 44Net wrote:
To begin with, the TAC sees value in the Intranet and
we do not consider it useless. We have a large number of users that agree with this
statement and they want this private use case supported. We also believe and try to make
connecting to the Internet much easier than it is today. Hopefully we will achieve it with
one of the available methods, the Global Backbone / Connectivity Platform. Through this,
all private networks like the HAMNET or the Belgium part will be able to connect to each
other. But they can do so today, using tunnels and VPNs.
I also see value in the
intranet. Here in Australia, the issue of
interconnecting ham radio to the Internet is still a significant
regulatory one, so my dominant use cases are either providing Internet
facing services for hams (44.190.8/24 is dedicated to this), or intranet
use (which is what 44.136.76.0/24 is for).
One unanticipated issue I've had is connectivity between by two IP
blocks is poor by default (having to go via San Diego from VK isn't
ideal!), but I locally solved that problem with a private route over a
VPN between here and the host that 44.190.8/24 runs on.
It does flag a potential issue for some other IRLP reflectors though - I
can't have an IRLP node with a VPN address, unless I'm careful about
routing.
The existing network DOES have problems in some corner cases, and this
is definitely the time to look at solutions.
Give me smooth connection between the Intranet and Internet 44net sites
running BGP, and I might be inclined to renumber. ;)
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com