Hi all
TNX to Antonious for his explanations. As far as I understand the whole
bunch:
1.)
44.0/10 can talk to the whole world - whole world can talk to them
This implies that 44/10 can talk to 44.128/10 via the PoPs (without
NAT!) --> only ONE routing entry. Intelligence for this is in the PoPs.
2.)
44.128/10 can talk to 44.128/10 - talks to 44.0/10 via the PoPs
(without NAT!) --> only ONE routing entry. Intelligence is in the PoPs
Consequenses:
- Issue of not knowing which networks are direct bgp and which are not
has completey gone for both groups.
- No multiple routing entries in "primitive" home-routers any more
- Existing NAT-Issues (e.g. echolink) are gone
- No separation inside the 44net-community any more: full connectivity
- thoughts about technical solutions (e.g. PoPs) have been done and
could be adopted
- there is no "either...or" , the proposal is open
In my opinion this is a very consistent concept and it would be a great
advantage for the whole community.
Therefore I think it is worth to do some "house-cleaning" (call for
renumbering) by the ARDC _before_ setting up the technical solutions for
this approach.
73s de Egbert DD9QP
Am 30.07.21 um 08:34 schrieb Ruben ON3RVH via 44Net:
Antonios,
I really don't get it.
...