9 Aug
2021
9 Aug
'21
4:51 p.m.
ARDC has $, build a custom carrier for a CM4 that has 2 Ethernet ports, a
USB hub, a couple of serial ports et, sell it to Hams below cost, problem
goes away. There are all kids of options, and there is no one size fits
all. the point here is to come up with "easy ways" to get on the net.
Cheap, Easy, Performant pick 2.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:43 PM David McGough via 44Net <
44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
These work GREAT!
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08P2C2GXF/
Use the native 1GbE port on an RPi4B or Rock64 with VLANs and this makes a
very competent router that is rock-solid.
73, David KB4FXC
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, pete M via 44Net wrote:
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
Thanks for the suggestion Steve.
The use of Vlan and a managed switch seem like a good idea.
But you need to remember 2 thing in the solution that need to be
deployed here.
Not every switch is managable, most that are will
cost more than the
RPI, lambda ham does not even know what a Vlan is. And using a
cheap
repurposed 10/100 switch will provide a maximum 50 Mb/s at max as it will
be used twice for each inbound/outbound packets. But it will be a more
stable solution than USB Ethernet NIC.
We need to supply a simple and stable solution for the average ham that
start in
networking and easy to support. useage of Vlan wont cut it. USB
ethernet nic will be the same. Yes the RPI 4 will do it. But you have to
remember that most ham's that have a RPI 2 or even a RPI B will want to use
his board to experiement. If we do this we will loose the interest of many
by offerring networks that will be slow compared to what they are use to.
And if by bad luck we fall on the geek of the place that the other ham look
upon to use a specific tehnology or not, the 44net wont be used in large
chunk of the globe. This aint our goal.
________________________________________
De : 44Net <44net-bounces+petem001=hotmail.com(a)mailman.ampr.org> de la
part
de Steve L via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
Envoyé : 9 août 2021 16:46
À : 44Net general discussion
Cc : Steve L
Objet : Re: [44net] On Allocations, PoPs, and Proposals
USB adapter or the use of VLAN tags and a managed switch.
ex:
https://engineerworkshop.com/blog/raspberry-pi-vlan-how-to-connect-your-rpi…
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:20 PM K7VE - John via 44Net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
>
> Pete,
>
> RPI works just fine with USB to Ethernet adapters. You can add
multiple
> Ethernet connections in this way.
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 9:06 AM pete M via 44Net <
44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I have a question about using a RPI for net44.
> >
> > Since this device only have one physical Ethernet port (and a Wi-Fi
NIC).
> >
> > By which way are you hoping to use those to route some traffic?
> >
> > Entering by Wi-Fi then out from the Ethernet port? That can work,
but I
> > would not like that.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > De : 44Net <44net-bounces+petem001=hotmail.com(a)mailman.ampr.org> de
la
> > part de Toussaint OTTAVI via 44Net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
> > Envoyé : 9 août 2021 05:07
> > À : 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
> > Cc : Toussaint OTTAVI
> > Objet : Re: [44net] On Allocations, PoPs, and Proposals
> >
> >
> > Le 03/08/2021 à 18:54, Rob PE1CHL via 44Net a écrit :
> > > While I agree that it is attractive to use a Raspberry Pi because
of its
> > availability
> > > and the capability to also host some applications on the same
device
> > aside from
> > > doing the routing, in my experience it is much easier to use a
dedicated
> > router
> > > like the MikroTik hEX (RB750Gr3) available for about the same
price, but
> > having
> > > 5 ethernet ports and all software required for VPN and routing
> > pre-installed and
> > > much easier to configure and maintain than a Raspberry Pi.
> > >
> > > Of course there always are multiple options. And Raspberry Pi
should be
> > one of them.
> >
> > The network setup must be as standard as possible, so that it can be
> > implemented on a large amount of equipment :
> > - People building networks, remote sites, repeaters, or advanced
users
> > with some network knowledge, may prefer
a dedicated router platform,
> > such as Mikrotik, UBNT, OpenWRT, etc...
> > - Beginners or standalone users may prefer plug-and-play setup on a
> > Raspberry Pi. The most obvious example that comes to my mind is
Pi-Star
> > (a very good Pi appliance for digital
modes hotspot or repeater,
which
embeds many existing software for D-Star, DMR, YSF
etc... into a
coherent and easy to use WEB UI).
73 de TK1BI
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
--
------------------------------
John D. Hays - K7VE
Kingston, WA
<http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
<http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays>
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net