12 Nov
2014
12 Nov
'14
8:07 a.m.
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 10:16 +0100, Rob Janssen wrote:
Ok, but then I think those gateway entries should not
be distributed via RIP.
When they are directly routable, should we use a tunnel to reach them?
That's only half the equasion. The other half is when one is SAFed
(Source Address FilterED) and they policy route 44/8 via their tunnel
interface, and anything else via UCSD... we either need to insure that
we have a separate listing of 44-net IPs using BGP so we can reverse
munge script those IPs.so that they're not trapped being policy routed
via local tunnels, unless amprgate will handle tunnelled routing for
these IPs...?
--
If Microsoft intended Windows to be for ham usage,
they would have incorporated our protocols into their kernel.
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web: http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, and Vermont.