12 May
2015
12 May
'15
10:55 p.m.
Hi Eric,
Do you have any particular services in mind? Depending on your application
(such as scale/data requirements) it looks like you could use on-demand
services from Amazon for something like this (via Direct Connect), should
you really really want to do it.
With that said, I am not sure what the advantage of this is (aside from
perhaps the dynamic IP issue you mention), though, since you could always
write a script to login to the AMPRNet portal and tweak the IPIP tunnels
with any WAN IP address updates. When you have the free gateway over in
California already, it seems like that would be the way to go aside from
directly advertising your own BGP CIDR block.
-Andrew
Kc2LTO
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Eric Fort <eric.fort(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
> After completing a successful experiment that demonstrated just how easy it
> can be to connect to amprnet without any need for a static public ip
> address and by just a few peers working together I'm looking for interested
> parties that may be interested in sharing the cost of a cloud based vpn
> server which would then host a 44/24 netblock routed via bgp. use of
> standard vpn tools makes this setup extremely easy and usable/compatable
> with NAT firewalls, and standard dynamic routing protocols and tools make
> things easy as well. I'd like to set this up based in the usa on plenty of
> bandwidth. please speak up if you would be willing to share cost and help
> make a go of this.
>
> Eric
> AF6EP
>