Hi,
there is a gateway alive for 44.224.0.0/15. Maybe this initial script
doesn't take /15 into account...
73,
Jann
On 19.01.2016 02:10, Neil Johnson wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
The initial script is done:
" 44.225.65.22 ","GATENOTFOUND"
" 44.50.192.22 "," 108.160.233.78 "
" 44.225.66.220 ","GATENOTFOUND"
" 44.225.65.220 ","GATENOTFOUND"
" 44.225.64.220 ","GATENOTFOUND"
" 44.225.66.221 ","GATENOTFOUND"
" 44.225.64.221 ","GATENOTFOUND"
" 44.225.66.222 ","GATENOTFOUND"
" 44.225.64.222 ","GATENOTFOUND"
" 44.225.66.23 ","GATENOTFOUND"
" 44.225.65.23 ","GATENOTFOUND"
" 44.50.192.23 "," 108.160.233.78 "
" 44.225.66.24 ","GATENOTFOUND"
and so on
Of the 36059 address records 30176 don't have a gateway associated with
them. Seems kind of a large amount. I'll do some more sanity checking.
--
Jann Traschewski, Faber-Castell-Str. 9, D-90522 Oberasbach, Germany
Tel.: +49-911-99946898, Mobile: +49-170-1045937, E-Mail: jann(a)gmx.de
Ham: DG8NGN / DB0VOX,
http://www.qsl.net/dg8ngn