Let me just make this clear as I can. Using BGP to bring islands of net-44
into the Internet --
Does not mean end users need BGP
Does not mean end users need BGP
Does not mean end users need BGP
Does not mean end users need BGP
Does not mean end users need BGP
Does not mean end users need BGP
A few, maybe as little as 10, border nodes might run BGP and *provide
VPN/Tunnel services to everyone else* and not everyone needs to run the
same VPN/Tunnel protocol. Routing takes care of getting from point A to
point B. The idea is to have a fully connected address space using the
Internet/BGP to interconnect.
There can be multi-homing and tiers to minimize single points of failure.
How many of you can say your 'home' ampr-lan doesn't have a single point
of failure?
Encap/IPIP and RIP tables could theoretically have 16 million entries for
Net-44, why not use aggregation and a tiered network instead?
As I see it, the end user would use a router (a cheap Mikrotik or RasPi)
with one or more upstream VPN connections to a border node or sub-tier
router and would route all non-local 44net traffic over that
connection/those connections. All the user needs is a VPN/Tunnel
configuration and credentials provided by the border node/tier router
operator. So much simpler.
Think big net, not personal net.
------------------------------
John D. Hays
K7VE
PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223
<http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
<http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays>