Re: [44net] DNS (was: Nevada IP Assignments)

I will try to find email address' for my entries and see if I get a response. I agree with John. There may not be a gateway related so I don't want to drop any if they are still being used. I can tell though that these are mostly Northern Nevada assignments and at some point they were hot and heavy in tcpip looking at the ip assignments. But Ill give them a short chance though. Also, if they hadn't responded here in the group, Im assuming they are not being used so Ill give it just a little and then....... Delete, delete, delete. LOL Thanks gang Harold K7ILO Nevada IP Coordinator -----Original Message----- From: 44Net [mailto:44net-bounces+k7ilo1=gmail.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Brian Kantor Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 5:35 PM To: AMPRNet working group Subject: Re: [44net] DNS (was: Nevada IP Assignments) (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 07:10:48PM -0600, Neil Johnson wrote: checking. It's necessary to include the non-gatewayed subnets as well since they also make use of the DNS. We don't want to delete DNS entries for them. To do that, you'll need a list of ALL the subnets registered with the portal. The encap file is insufficient. Chris will have to speak to whether the portal API can furnish that list of subnets. If it can, well and good, but if it can't, we'll have to come up with some other way to get that list. - Brian _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net