sorry for my loose vs lose....I'm "lysdexic" aka dyslexic and things slip
thru spell check sometimes when I'm in a hurry.
L
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Ralph <ralphlists(a)bsrg.org> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Actually, I did not say "loose". I said "lose". But I agree that we
should
use it properly.
It isn't up to one person to say what properly is, though The world has
come
a long way since you could hide a little router at a big institution and
route/control the entire world. Unfortunately as you know it is not
spectrum and has no FCC (or similar) protection. It is not beyond
comprehension for us to be approached and asked "nicely" to use it or lose
it.
If I am a Ham, and have the right to use the space, and it is provided to
me
over Non-Amateur-Radio means (i.e. Routed to me by my ISP over wireless,
fiber, tin cans and a string), then I feel that I can and will use it for
what I want. It is an IP address not a radio channel.
We tie up over 16 million valuable addresses. Large companies have given up
address space like this, for the greater good of the Internet. But WE need
to keep every one of these addresses to connect up our little BBS's with
1.2k analog modems. Or maybe the odd one-in-a-million experimenter actually
might use 56k.
I would encourage us to use this resource to the maximum benefit of Hams,
not sit on it so we can say "look at us, rest of the Internet, I have a /8
and you don't".
I feel positive that we will come to some sort of conclusion that mill
mostly satisfy everyone.
Maybe we should begin a list of the wants and needs of at least this group
so far.
I wonder what sort of attention we would get if this whole story were
posted
over on /. or the like. Let's try to solve this properly and quickly and
with as little amount of outside "help" if possible.
Ralph
44 Net is not just for tunneling
Use the allocation (right) or lose it, just like 220
-----Original Message-----
From: Bjorn Pehrson [mailto:bpehrson@kth.se]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 2:32 AM
To: AMPRNet working group; Ralph
Subject: Re: [44net] OpenVPN
I would rephrase that to "use the allocation right or loose it".
Ham addresses (out of the 44/8 space) should be regarded as spectrum.
You cannot use it commercially or you loose your license.
Why would hams get to keep a /8 space if it is no different than other
spaces?
If you do not want to tunnel, arrange for the peering/transit you need.
On 06/08/2012 02:25 AM, Ralph wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
We don't want a tunnel.
We want them sent through our Tier 1 upstream provider to our ISP,
which I own and provide service to other Hams on.
That is why we contacted you in the first place Brian.
44 Net is not just for tunneling
Use the allocation or lose it, just like 220 (tm)
-
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5055 - Release Date: 06/07/12
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
--
Lin Holcomb
Office: +1 404 806 5412
Mobile: +1 404 933 1595
Fax: +1 404 348 4250
<http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net>