9 Dec
2021
9 Dec
'21
11 a.m.
Okay so we will leave the over the air regulations part out of the discussion.
What I see is that "secure communications" are mostly dictated by the
user end applications. So I don't feel that it really has anything to
do with ARDC, as technically they just administer the IP space (not
really even the networks). However if you are suggesting best
(secure) practices for interconnecting the proposed points of
presence, then that could be a valid discussion topic, and that would
be best discussed with those on that committee.
There was a good idea, basically an IETF for ham radio a while back,
and it's website or formal name escapes me ( I am sure someone will
chime in). That would likely be a good way to address your concerns.
I feel your idea has to be a concept presented to a number of user and
application software developers.
Steve
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 1:23 PM Kevin Walsh via 44Net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
It would be most helpful if the amprnet BOD could post in writing an
official statement regarding using common secure communications (https. TLS
etc.) over the 44. IP network.
This email list is used for communications regarding the use of the IP
address space. I'm not asking about the use of encryption over part 97 RF
radio, just the 44 network IP address space. I am not aware of any portion
of the Part 97 rules that apply to the wired internet at large.
Everyone has an opinion, but it's time for the amprnet Board to clarify the
muddy waters around the use of the amprnet IP space and publish those rules.
Please!
73,
Kevin Walsh
W8KHW
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net