Re: [44net] misconfigured encap routers?

On 20 April 2017 at 04:33 Brian Kantor <Brian(a)UCSD.Edu> wrote: (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ I've been analyzing some of the encap traffic and finding unexpected things. Several sources of ipencap'd packets being received by amprgw have non-44 inner source addresses. Would you all agree that a protocol-4 (ipencap) packet reaching the UCSD gateway should always have an inner (encap'd) source address on the 44-net? And that those that don't should be considered bogus and be discarded? - Brian _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net ______________________________________________ This email has been scanned by Netintelligence http://www.netintelligence.com/email