12 Apr
2013
12 Apr
'13
11:37 a.m.
Don,
Those problems were resolved yesterday. Rip44d has been updated to
version 1.3, it now correctly adds routes to the kernel routing table
(which are referenced by their network address and CIDR prefix).
The 0's refer to the routing tables and CIDR type routing, which for a
/24 (or 256 IP host network), the network [address] begins at 0, the
first usable address is 1, and the broadcast is 255.
Prior to the rip44d fix, the problem was rip44d-based routers would only
have 44.182.21.0 (a single IP address, /32) in their table, instead of
44.182.21.0/24 (which references 44.182.21.1-44.182.21.254). Therefore,
Marius and I couldn't ping each other because I did not have a route for
the IPs 44.182.21.1-254.
-Lynwood