Hi Ruben
I agree there still is the split/brain problem. To overcome this into
deep things most often might be much more complicated than they look in
the first moment.
73 de Egbert DD9QP
Am 30.07.21 um 10:55 schrieb Ruben ON3RVH via 44Net:
Hi Egbert,
If we read the proposal and answers from Antonio, then the following statement you made
is not correct:
--
2.)
44.128/10 can talk to 44.128/10 - talks to 44.0/10 via the PoPs (without NAT!) -->
only ONE routing entry. Intelligence is in the PoPs
--
44.128/10 CANNOT talk to 44.0/10. 44.128/10 is, in their vision, a completely separate
network, which can only be reached via RF. And to communicate with 44.128/10 you would
need a new subnet within 44.128/10 ON TOP of your 44.0/10 subnet. So this makes routing in
"home routers" (of which most ISP routers/modems cannot add any kind of static
routes) more complex as you'll have 2 static routes to take care of and monitor.
73
Ruben ON3RVH