14 Jul
2020
14 Jul
'20
9:26 a.m.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 2:30 PM Rob Janssen via 44Net <
44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
IPv6 has been discussed before, and I think the
predominant opinion is
that we should NOT get a /32 for
an IPv6 version of AMPRnet (and get the same routing issues as we now
have for IPv4), but rather we
should encourage everyone to get IPv6 space from their own ISP or from a
local IPv6 tunnel provider,
I disagree here, but only because I want to recommend running 44-net as an
ham-centric ISP, and it will need to be dual-stacked.
The nice thing is that it's easier to purchase and announce IPv6 space, but
eventually routing tables will grow very large, and /48s might get filtered
for speed/space purpose
Thankfully, we can cross that bridge later on, since the public /32 ipv6
range is not running out anytime soon, and someone would need to pay for it.
-Clive