Re: [44net] Re Networks in OZ

In Australia as far as I know the only ones who are directly connected are those entries in the bgp table Which only numbers a couple ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lin Holcomb" <LHolcomb(a)clearqualitygroup.com> To: "AMPRNet working group" <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu> Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 2:31 AM Subject: Re: [44net] Re Networks in OZ > (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) > _______________________________________________ > Matt the problem will also be some of 44 will be directly connected to the > Internet(not thur UCSD) if they have any route to the net the local DNS > could cause conflict or just a miss configured router. Just like a few > companies have had when using 1.X.x.x as a private LAN. It was Allocated > to the US DoD I think, but it looks to have been released now. A mis > configured router drew quite a bit of attention from them as you can > imagine. I still see 1.1.1.1 used a lot as an interrupt login page at > hotels, ect for free or pay Internet. > > My understanding is that there may be some rouge direct connected > 44 address ranges out there too. This is from a friend at a national > CATV/ISP provider. > I don't remember the specifics but prior to the policy Change by AMPR > regarding this allocation we found some of these in their AS. If memory > serves some were in VK. This is some thing we really need to run down.... > With 16million addresses this is a hard task to police. I am guessing > that ISPs have whole groups that just deal with rouge networks in their IP > space. Just running a scan is not going to work as most ISPs will shut ya > down if you tried to scan a whole class A. It really needs to be looked > at > in a AS. Not Brian's at UCSD as his will be correct. > > Lin N4YCI > > > > > -- > Lin Holcomb > > Office: +1 404 806 5412 > Mobile: +1 404 933 1595 > Fax: +1 404 348 4250 >