7 Aug
2013
7 Aug
'13
7:55 p.m.
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Brian Kantor wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:22:35AM +0300, Heikki Hannikainen wrote:
So there's now 12 redundant transmissions of the same data. There would
be no increase in net traffic if those 12 transmissions came from 12
different sources. Probably overkill, how about going for three
transmitters, eack on 15 minute intervals?
--
Rick Green, N8BJX
...I live in the hope that one day the fine line of distinction between
genius and insanity will be decided in my favor.
Also, it should be straightforward to set up a
replacement route
announcer somewhere else if necessary. It should probably be prepared
in advance so that it's easy to just fire it up as necessary.
Actually, both could run at the same time just as well, the receivers
wouldn't care if they got the announcements twice from two different
sources. Brian, how about that?
Sounds reasonable to me. The obvious place for the other announcer is
at the portal as it's the other place with the current database.
amprgw loads new routes at the top of the hour. The announce interval
is five minutes.
- Brian