4 Sep
2017
4 Sep
'17
3:08 a.m.
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 01:36:10AM -0500, Steve L wrote:
I guess the more pertinent questions I have for Brian
would be:
Are there a plan so that folks who only have IPv6 commercial address
or are suck behind carrier grade IPv4 with no firewall access (some
cellular carriers presently) can participate with the amprnet? In
other words are there plans to make amprgw dual stack?
(I think you meant 'stuck', not 'suck'. Is that a Freudian slip?)
There's no plan to make amprgw dual stack. I'm not sure that the question
is meaningful; what would it DO with an incoming IPv6-only packet?
It's not going to be a NAT64 gateway, that's for certain.
Interoperability of IPv4-only and IPv6-only hosts is a sticky wicket
that in my opinion NO ONE has solved satisfactorily.
- Brian