Re: [44net] directly routed subnets

Shouldn't it be up to the router user to decide if they want to do directly routed or tunneled subnets? Assi kk7kx -----Original Message----- From: 44net-bounces+assi=kiloxray.com(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu [mailto:44net-bounces+assi=kiloxray.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Brian Kantor Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:15 AM To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu Subject: [44net] directly routed subnets I've gotten several requests for directly routed subnets (ie, BGP announced CIDR blocks as subnets of 44/8, not tunneled) for ham radio use. These are people who want to set up HSMM networks in the ham bands, D-Star constellations, etc. I thought I'd ask folks what they think of the idea of setting aside part of the address space for that purpose? What issues do you see arising from doing so? - Brian _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net