22 Jan
2017
22 Jan
'17
6:37 p.m.
Hi Tom,
thanks for letting me know about the DMR connectivity over 44net.
I'm now in conversation with the European co-ordinators to find the best
way to support our needs.
Vy 73 de Darren
G7LWT / AK4DB
On 22 January 2017 at 00:42, Tom Hayward <esarfl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Storer, Darren <darren.storer(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Tentatively I asked A&A if they could BGP
advertise a subnet of ampr.org
and they'd be happy to do that, so it's more of a question of whether
D-STAR services for hams would be okay to provide via AMPRNet? Are there
any rules that would prevent the dsync pages being dual homed via public
IP
space and ampr.org IP space? Has anyone managed
to regularly route
digital
voice (UDP) over AMPRNet?
We have a number of DMR repeaters on our block of 44net addresses.
This block is BGP announced as you describe. The DMR repeaters form a
"mesh" for local traffic over the local network (still the 44net
addresses). Linking to the C-bridge for internet linking goes over the
default route (internet). It works pretty well for the most part. We
have had to QSY once or twice because someone stomped on our 5.8 GHz
backhaul into the datacenter. This was causing packet loss which
affected voice quality. All was good once we moved to a clear
frequency (again).
Tom KD7LXL
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net