Right. But surely something in the BGP routing authentication mechanisms could also be
modified to suite our purposes.
In general, I understand Eric's frustration and I also abhor the use of
non-standard/custom stuff. I also understand that amateur radio is about experimentation.
But it's amateur "radio", not amateur "internet protocol
development". In my mind, exploring and experimenting with how to use standard
Internet protocols in new and interesting ways to support radio comms is as far as we
should go.
That said, it may be that a standard protocols just don't exist for what we need to
do. One thing that creates a problem for us is the "amateur" part. In other
words, I am reticent to place too much faith in the next up-stream BBS operator since
it's not a business, there are no service level contracts, he/she probably doesn't
have an IT staff, and he/she eventually goes on vacation, gets sick, loses interest, has a
hot date that night, or whatever. So methods and procedures that work very well in the
commercial world don't necessarily work at all in our world.
I know several folks here have expended many more brain cells than I have in order to
figure out where to go next. I just hope they keep the focus on amateur *radio* and
resist with every fiber of their being the desire to develop additional non-standard
protocols. And if it just can't be done any other way, then I would urge a strategy
of using existing standard functionality (like the logic and behavior of a BGP route
reflector -- if not most of the actual source code) and "porting" it, with as
little change as possible. But I do how we actually go somewhere and we're not here
on this list 6 months from now having the same conversation again.
Michael
N6MEF
-----Original Message-----
From: 44net-bounces+n6mef=mefox.org(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
[mailto:44net-bounces+n6mef=mefox.org@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Marc, LX1DUC
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:17 AM
To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: [44net] Multiple gateways for same route
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
The idea of route servers/route reflectors isn't bad at all.
However as some host might connect from dynamic IP addresses you will need to come up with
something additional to authenticate the remote gateways.
73 de Marc