7 Feb
2016
7 Feb
'16
12:56 p.m.
Hello Marius,
Let me motivate:
Amprgw DNS entries are only relevant for connected subnets. There is
no public accessible tunnelled 44 network without having a portal
entry. If there is no such entry, the tunnels would not work.
BGP announced 44 subnets are well known, and can be easily excepted
from the delete process.
All other existing dns entries associated with a 44 address, if they
exist, will be not be impacted in any way, since they are isolated,
and the dns services at amprgw are not used by them.
My speicific issue here is that my local AMPR coordinator recently told
me that unless all my IP addresses had a DNS entry, I risked loosing my
allocations. I think this is a policy that *he* is setting himself (not
a global AMPR policy) and though I don't agree with his view, I obliged
to give him ~1024 hostnames to fill things out. If other AMPR
coordinators have similar approaches, then DNS entries mean everything
to the IP allocation be it a subnet or a /32.
--David
KI6ZHD