On 14/05/2017 7:06 PM, Rob Janssen wrote:
Yes, I think there has been some ISP/Manufacturer
working group to get
this
cleared up and defined. My ISP waited with IPv6 rollout until this was
resolved, and the router they deliver does exactly what you describe
above.
Yes, good solution
When IPv6 was designed, the idea was still that every host should be able
to communicate with every other host. That has proven to be a bad idea
on an open network, so IPv6 had to be crippled to make it viable. But
that
at the same time removes one of the major incentives to roll it out,
as NAT
can be used as an alternative solution in most situations. Many places
have still not started IPv6 rollout...
The reason I prefer IPv6 over IPv4 NAT is it
gives me the option to use
the same ports on multiple hosts on my network. IPv4 NAT is quite
crippling for some of ujs (who also happen to know how to manage our
firewalls ;) ).
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com