- AMPRNet / HamNet routing is quite complicated for a
non-IT guy. BGP
requires huge equipment and skills. IPIP requires hacking protocol
redirect on Internet boxes. Those are not easy things for people
operating a voice repeater or hotspot. They just build a Pi image, plug
the machine, and it works. Why should they bother with complex addressing ?
We have quite some repeaters that are connected via AMPRnet.
We normally use MikroTik routers. I do not consider these "huge
equipment" and they are not difficult to configure with BGP.
I have some example configs for setting up an endpoint with L2TP/IPsec
tunnel to our gateway router and using BGP to advertise their own subnet.
This is much easier to get going than IPIP, for example there is no need
to touch the existing internet router (open ports/protocols not required).
This even makes it suitable for installation on buildings where the
owner may make available some guest internet access but would not want
you to tweak their network to pass IPIP.
The advantage of using BGP even in this trivial case is that the network
can now be extended when the opportunity arises without having another
hurdle of complexity.
A WiFi link to another station can be added, e.g. in some cases people
have an internet connection at an amateur nearby the repeater, and then
a WiFi link to the repeater itself.
I would be all for rolling out such a system worldwide to replace the
IPIP mesh.
Routers (e.g. MikroTik CHR that can run as a VPS) in datacenters all
over the world interconnected with a static tunnel mesh and offering VPN
service for local amateurs to connect, and routing using BGP on private
AS (this only routes AMPRnet, not full internet).
In different places those routers could have the AMPRnet subnet(s) for
that region announced on internet, like we do for 44.137.0.0/16 and
others do for other country networks.
And each of those can offer different VPN technologies so you are able
to follow the trend of the day without having to do a migration in the
entire network.
Rob PE1CHL