13 Jun
2015
13 Jun
'15
6:09 p.m.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Bryan Fields <Bryan(a)bryanfields.net> wrote:
This is a joke, correct?
For someone who's on the ARDC technical committee, you seem to be pretty
apt at shooting down solutions rather than implementing them.
You're proposing fixing broken routing using a
non-standard protocol. IIRC
EIGRP uses IP multicast for announcements (same as OSPF) so you'd need to
run
it over some sort of tunnel (gre) interface anyways.
Yes. And you're also not the boss of my subnet either. How else do you
proposed routing non-44net traffic into 44net without creating routing
loops and without breaking the current infrastructure on a global scale?
Just use BGP with a private AS up to the edge Internet
connected BGP nodes
if
you're building tunnels.
People already have tunnels. I'm talking about delivering traffic.
Tim Osburn and myself (and others) had proposed
standards based way to move
the IPIP tunnels to a redundant gateway design a few years back. It's not
hard, but there is no movement from ARDC to actually move forward with it.
I'd be happy with a study of proposed ideas, at least it's forward
movement.
Code or it didn't happen. Oh wait, spec isn't code.