5 Feb
2021
5 Feb
'21
10:09 p.m.
You act or it is already decided. There are also clearly disadvantages of what some have
proposed and I don't
talk about backups of ucsd to Internet, what is good. No, it is that it makes amprnet
gateways more (or totally) dependent on
other core (ARDC) routers to route to other amprnet gateways over Internet. It doesn't
make it less dependent,
it adds another layer on top of that. Presently, I'm more or less independent with my
individual tunnels (and I care
less that they are using ipip or another protocol) or when I should be running bgp.
Instead that the risk is spread,
it will be more concentrated with these proposals what I have read here and at the 44NGN
list. This all to make
it more easier? I'm already providing a lot of these services.
Bob VE3TOK
On 2021-02-05 09:59, Rob PE1CHL via 44Net wrote:
Hopefully the "new core network" will be
deployed "soon" so that indivuduals have no need to route
a subnet via BGP just to get short roundtriptime to internet. It will make it much
easier to be connected
to AMPRnet and internet without having to know and handle all that BGP related
information.
Rob
On 2/5/21 3:38 PM, Angelo via 44Net wrote:
--
When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change
Max Planck