Re: [44net] A new era of IPv4 Allocations : Agree

You are again over simplyfing the situation to squeeze your solution as possible. For your solution to work we need a setup a list of net that are either ham only, ham and internet, internet only. Imagine that a ham with a /20 and he use them to supply ip to a few service for ham only, some are for service for both internet and ham only, and some service just for the internet for club server that have publicity running on it, so it should not be over the air waves at all. and he supply a way to connect to ampr by a an rf network and each endpoint can deceide to be A or B. the IP are all scattered between al the use case. Just imagine the needed list to have that network running as it should by the pop. Now, we continu with 500 new allocation that do the same, add a few thousand new user asking for a /28 with each ip that can be used as any of the 3 possibility and put that in the routing and or firewalling of the pop. Now imagine that the list get corrupted, go find the problematic data! What you are porposing is a very good way of destabilize our whole address space. There are ways of doing things with networks, those method have been proven to be stable, easily reproductible, have human readable config files and they plain works. I sure hope this will be taken in consideration ________________________________________ De : 44Net <44net-bounces+petem001=hotmail.com(a)mailman.ampr.org> de la part de Ruben ON3RVH via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Envoyé : 11 août 2021 03:29 À : 44Net general discussion Cc : Ruben ON3RVH Objet : Re: [44net] A new era of IPv4 Allocations : Agree This is easily fixable at the pop level. Still no need for complicated setups. Since every subnet has to he known in the portal, a script could parse the portal for all known subnets and only allow those in and block the unknown subnets. Again, no need for complicated routers/routing. At the edge level you allow 44/9 & 44.128/10 and the pop filters the rest so that bgp hijacked subnets cannot even get to the network, let alone your edge There’s a simple answer to all cases that does not need renumbering. We also cannot have a part of the network not reachable for other hams and cannot ask every ham to have 2 subnets and do complex routing themselves. Amprnet is an open network for hams and everything should be easily reachable to all hams that connect to amprnet. Ruben - ON3RVH _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net