Re: [44net] Traffic not routing to my gateway

Hello Craig, I'm a bit late to the thread but JUNOS is actually very open to automation. Shell scripts and Python is available via the shell in JUNOS and either using the "cli" command or the CLI's "load merge" command, you can do about anything you want. There is Junoscript which might be the best solution for this simple task but there is also full SDK APIs for JUNOS as well as OpenConfig support. I know that JUNOS on the MX/PTX supports but I don't think the SRX supports it just yet. If you have problems getting this going, message me offline and I can get you in touch with someone who can help. --David KI6ZHD On 05/18/2017 11:43 AM, Craig Brauckmiller wrote: > (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) > _______________________________________________ > Hmmmm. Not as simple as I was hoping. > > Does the amprgw act as the actual gateway between the 44 Net and the rest > of the internet? I assume so. > > I will have to look into scripting the SRX to make this work. As people > pointed out, the scripting will be the key and I am not a script expert by > any stretch. If I were to provide the Junos commands needed to create the > tunnel for a node, would someone be able to write a script to process the > encap file? > > The commands to create the tunnel interface are : > set interfaces ip-0/0/0 unit 0 tunnel source 96.86.86.53 > set interfaces ip-0/0/0 unit 0 tunnel destination 169.228.66.251 > set interfaces ip-0/0/0 unit 0 family inet address 44.44.7.17/29 > > The "unit" number needs to be incremented for each entry. > > Thanks > > Craig > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Rudy Hardeman (PD0ZRY) <pd0zry(a)pd0zry.nl> > wrote: > >> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) >> _______________________________________________ >> No so sure about that, it is not very difficult to create complex scripts >> on a SRX or even compile software for the platform (freebsd) >> >> So saying doing it on the SRX is impossible is just as saying its >> impossible on a mikrotik. >> >> --- >> 73 Rudy pd0zry >> >> >> >> >> On 2017-05-18 19:34, Rob Janssen wrote: >> >>> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> IPIP is possible on the SRX but not in cluster (virtual chassis mode) >>>> >>> Being able to setup a single or even multiple IPIP tunnels is not >>> suffcient to >>> be a member of the AMPRnet IPIP mesh. See what Brian wrote: >>> >>> This is a mesh network, not a star, so there is no default route; you >>>> need a separate tunnel route to each gateway you want to communicate >>>> with, >>>> >>> Marius has written a very nice script to get it working on a MikroTik >>> router, >>> but most other commercial routers lack the scripting capabilities to pull >>> this >>> off on their own. Someone wrote a script to use a Cisco router but it >>> requires >>> a separate machine to run it. >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> _________________________________________ >>> 44Net mailing list >>> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu >>> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net >>> >> >> >> _________________________________________ >> 44Net mailing list >> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu >> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net >> >