6 Jun
2012
6 Jun
'12
1:57 a.m.
Hi Lin,
Considering what is at stake, I would still advocate going for an AS to
keep the unique character of AMPRnet.
We should not underestimate the strength of the concept and the public
good component.
Delegating the non-radio links to commercial operators is likely to
limit the scope of AMPRnet, make innovation harder and create less
alternative infrastructure.
I may be overly optimistic, but I do believe that, if we stick to
principles, we will get an ASN for free. And many of us do not find it
complex to set up. I think it is worth a try.
Bjorn
On 2012-06-06 00:24, Lin Holcomb wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Bjorne
I think the issue is the complexity and cost of obtaining and setting
up an AS.
While delegating this to the ISP/university who routes the 44net to
the radio interface point. It is common to lease IP addresses to
users in the commercial world. Those leases could be revoked by AMPR
if the user is not using the space or not using it per the TOUA. AMPR
could simply issue a letter to the ISP directing them to terminate the
AS entries.
Lin
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net