3 Aug
2015
3 Aug
'15
4:29 a.m.
I am running Marius' ampr-ripd version, routes show "proto 44"
root@kb9mwr# ip route show table 44
<clip>
44.182.69.0/24 via 5.15.186.251 dev tunl0 proto 44 onlink window 840
44.182.83.0/24 via 95.76.237.2 dev tunl0 proto 44 onlink window 840
44.185.1.0/24 via 109.107.73.62 dev tunl0 proto 44 onlink window 840
44.185.4.0/24 via 109.107.73.62 dev tunl0 proto 44 onlink window 840
etc..
kb9mwr@kb9mwr:~/test/ampr/ampr-ripd-1.13 $ grep "proto" ampr-ripd.c
* Observation: All routes are created with protocol set to 44
req.rtm.rtm_protocol = RTPROT_AMPR;
Marius can you explain the purpose of that for us? I am not completely
sold that is the problem, but at the same time I don't pretend to
understand the proto 44's purpose either.
Thanks.
Steve, KB9MWR
------ Quote ------
Can everyone verify their AMRPRNet tunl0 route tables do not include the
following value:
"proto 44"
This appears to have somehow entered some stations routing tables, the
value should be "table 44" for routers using a separate routing table,
as defined in STARTAMPR; or by using '-t' switch with RIP44d.
The ROUTING PROTOCOL value "proto 44" is invalid for routing on AMPRNet,
and I understand it should be zero (0) or unspecified.
- Lynwood
KB3VWG