1 Feb
2013
1 Feb
'13
4:40 p.m.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Brian Kantor <Brian(a)ucsd.edu> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 01:49:17PM -0800, Eric Fort wrote:
Wasn't saying they were not announced, merely that those in use should be
(larger blocks via bgp, small subnets via RIP) and if they are probably
should not be stepped on or used without coordination with the party
primarily allocated that block/subnet. one or more SWIP servers with a
requirement that all who are allocated address space keep their contact
info current would likely be quite useful here.
AF6EP
This seems to me why blocks should be announced
(probably via bgp).
BGP-routed subnets *are* announced via BGP. Tunnel-routed subnets
are announced via RIP and the manual gateway/encap file.
- Brian