19 Dec
2012
19 Dec
'12
3:58 a.m.
On 12-12-18 10:51 PM, Matt VK2RQ wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
so I would assume there is at least a bit of work being done on INP3?
That is good news, if there is any testing etc. needing to be done, I
would be very interested...tried the jnos inp3, but it confused the heck
out of my netrom
routing, as it locked the inp3 route way up to a netrom quality of 236
and there was no way it would back off..my INP3 link partner uses lower
qualities
such as default 10, locked axip/axudp are 80 or so...I've been told that
INP3 shouldn't be translated to a netrom quality, but I'm not sure how
that would affect routing...
Cheers,
John
howdy all, have been looking into
inter-operability of INP3 with netrom
quality-based routing, and see there has been work done for older
kernels but cannot find anything recent:
http://sharon.pi8zaa.ampr.org/users/pe1rxq/inp3.html
Maiko has ported this code to jnos I believe, but I don't see any
linux-native ports of the code more recent than kernel 2.6.4...I'm
running linux mint 10 and
mint 13 in my machines, and the kernel is much newer, haven't tried the
patch yet on the newer 3.0+ kernels, anyone had any experience with this?
Cheers,
John
Hi John,
I ported the patch to kernel 2.6.35, which I believe is what Mint 10 is based on.
However, I found serious deadlock issues that arise when nodes are withdrawn. For
details, and a link to the ported patch, see my post here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-hams/msg03116.html
73, Matt VK2RQ
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net