we need a white-hat bot-net to shut down that black-hat bot-net!! ;-)
On 15-07-21 02:32 AM, Brian Kantor wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
> On 2015-07-20 17:41, Assi Friedman wrote:
>> and rather poor packet loss. Are there any issues or QoS policies
>> implemented on the amprnet router at UCSD?
There's no QoS policy in
effect, but 'amprgw' is getting hammered
at the moment, with inbound packet drops peaking in the 25% range
so performance is going to be horrible.
It's hard to see precisely what's happening but it looks like multiple
hosts (possibly a botnet) are sweeping through the 44/8 range looking
for something.
There's not much we can do about this in the short term. Long term
includes a higher-performance machine with faster network interfaces.
- Brian
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net